This blog explores social attitudes in Jane Austen's time, discusses her novels, reviews forgotten 18th century novels, and throws some occasional shade at the modern academy. The introductory post is here. My "six simple questions for academics" post is here. Spoilers abound in my discussion of these forgotten novels, and I discuss 18th-century attitudes which I do not necessarily endorse. |

EKM’s writing contains many autobiographical elements, and this tragic tale found expression in one her elegies (quoted below) and was narrated in one of her children's books.
Ellinor, or, the Young Governess was published in 1802—the year EKM died--by the York publisher, Thomas Wilson & Son, who also published more children’s books posthumously. This suggests that EKM approached this local publisher in the final years of her life with some of her novel manuscripts, and was encouraged to write some children’s books instead. Her earnings, if any, would have been meagre, but it was better than nothing.
Producing a children’s book, in those days, was not so very difficult. As I’ve learned, authors simply plagiarized freely from popular poets, biographers, historians and books of natural history. They interspersed these plundered lessons within a morally improving narrative. Another case of a plagiarized children’s book is discussed here. In Ellinor, as is typical, a governess corrects the faults of the children in the Selby household while giving them mini-lectures about ducks, evaporation and rain (cribbed from Goldsmith’s Natural History), Demosthenes and Richard the Lion Heart, (from Dodd’s The Beauties of History), and Archbishop Fenelon (from Augustus Toplady).
But one of the story's moral lessons is from the pen of EKM herself--the story of her cousins. This occurs when the Selby family receives a letter and Lady Selby calls her children to attention to hear the news:
“My dear children,” said Lady Selby, “you were well acquainted with the beautiful Maria, and Emily.”
“O yes, Mamma,” said Amelia; “I have often envied their extreme beauty.”
Well of course, Lady Selby can't let that pass by unremarked, and lands on her little daughter like a ton of bricks: “Envy is a vile passion, Amelia, and expressive of a weak mind.” Then she tells Ellinor to read the letter aloud, which she does:

EKM added in a footnote, *These affecting incidents are strictly TRUE—The young ladies were nearly related to the Author, and have not been dead three years."
Through genealogical (parish) records, I was able to confirm that Sarah Amelia and Emily Strong were EKM's first cousins and they died in 1797. There may be an error in the transcription of records, because both girls were buried on the 25th, but one was buried in November and the other in September. I’d like to see a copy of the original parish record from St Peter church in Tiverton, because I am inclined to believe EKM when she says her account was “strictly true” and that Maria died a few days after Sarah Amelia. Maria was 19 years old and Sarah Amelia was 16. "Three years" since their death means that EKM was writing Ellinor in 1800, at the same time she was preparing her novel What Has Been for publication.
Charles Mathews' second wife, in her memoir of her husband, suggested that EKM published only one novel and hid her other manuscripts from her husband, but the evidence suggests that this just isn't true. She must have had several children's books being prepared for publication before her death. I can picture her walking from her little apartment on Stonegate in York to the offices of Thomas Wilson & Son (aka Wilson & Spence) on High Ousegate, clutching a manuscript or some corrected proofs--at least before she was too ill with tuberculosis to go anywhere.
As for the cause of her cousins' deaths, at first I supposed that Sarah Amelia had died of appendicitis, but in re-reading the passage, I must say that poisoning comes to mind as a possible cause of death for both sisters. The story also suggests, as I mentioned, that Sarah Strong was better-off than her impoverished sister-in-law, EKM's mother, if she was able to indulge her daughters in "every luxury."
EKM uses the deaths of her cousins for a moral purpose, in accordance with Christian doctrine that one should live acceptably in the eyes of God so as to be judged worthy of heaven. After listening to the tragic tale, "[E]very one present expressed a conviction of the necessity... of living in a constant preparation for death… The sudden death of Maria and Emily, had such an effect on the mind of Henrietta... that what love of virtue could not bring to pass, fear did. She was continually thinking how terrible it would be to die in an unprepared state; and therefore studied to be good and virtuous."
But alas, little Frederick…. He was “proud, obstinate and cruel,” and none of the admonitions and punishments he gets are sufficient to save him from his early death. He disobeyed his parents and fell into the pond, dying three weeks later. “During his illness, he expressed the utmost contrition for his past follies, and hoped that every child would learn from his fate, that wickedness and disobedience to parents, never go unpunished.” Thus at least we understand that Frederick will not go to the Bad Place when he dies.
The dire tone of these children's books may come as a surprise to modern readers. But Ellinor, or, the Young Governess is quite typical in meting out death to a disobedient child, pour encourager les autres.
In a future post, more about EKM's books for children.
I left the poetry for last, to make it easier to skip over... here is an extended excerpt from the elegy EKM wrote for her cousins, which appeared in Ellinor and in a posthumous book of her poetry.