LONA MANNING
  • Home
  • Books
    • Shelley Novella
  • Research
    • About Shelley
    • Peterloo
    • Kitty Riddle
    • 18th C. love poetry
  • Jane Austen
  • Blog
  • About Me
    • Teaching Philosophy

CMP#43  Guilt , Misery, & Plot Devices

4/25/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Clutching My Pearls is about Jane Austen and the times she lived in. Click here for the first in the series. 
​For the first post on this series about Mansfield Park and slavery, click here.

"The students who were Jane Austen fans felt instantly complicit for liking stories where slavery might be present without an explicit critique." 
                                         -- Patricia A. Matthews, "Jane Austen and the Abolitionist Turn." 
​                            Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 61 no. 4, 2019, p. 345-361
​​
"Let Other Pens Dwell on Guilt and Misery:" Colonialism as a Plot Device
      In previous posts, I shared some of the non-fiction and fictional literature around slavery and abolition written in Austen's time, to demonstrate that slavery was a much-discussed and debated topic.  The novels I mentioned stand in contrast to Mansfield Park for their explicit detail; in the examples I gave, the authors readily expressed their abolitionist sympathies. There were also novels and plays written during this period in which the worst thing to be said about West Indian planters was that they were vulgar and indolent.
     I now come to the most dangerous part of my thesis. There are also many examples of fictional works which referred to the West Indies, to West Indian planters, even to a slave uprising (in the case of 
Belinda) without editorial comment. Authors such as Maria Edgeworth and Barbara Hoflund who wrote pro-abolition fiction also wrote books in which colonial wealth, such as could be acquired in India, was simply a handy plot device. 
       Franco Moretti in his Atlas of the European Novel (1998) claims that “in sentimental novels at the turn of the century, the colonies are a truly ubiquitous presence... mentioned in two novels out of three, and overseas fortunes add up to one third, if not more, of the wealth in these texts.” Like me, he thinks Sir Thomas Bertram went to Antigua because the plot called for his lengthy absence for Mansfield Park, "he goes... because Austen needed him out of the way."

Read More
0 Comments

CMP#42  Was Slavery a Taboo Topic? Part 2

4/23/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Clutching My Pearls is about Jane Austen and the times she lived in. Click here for the first in the series.  
​"Habit, the tyrant of nature and of reason, is deaf to the voice of either; here she stifles humanity, and debases the species—for the master of slaves has seldom the soul of a man.”
​                                                             – Savillon, in Henry MacKenzie’s  Julia de Roubigné (1777)

Was Slavery a Taboo Topic in Austen's Time, Part Two: "This Vilest Traffic"
PictureChildren's story by Mary Pilkington, 1807
     In my previous post, I gave a sampling of non-fiction books of the late 18th and early 19th century, including books for children, which discussed slavery and colonialism.
​       Mansfield Park, as previously discussed, is not explicit about slavery. In fact, as you can see here, references to Sir Thomas Bertram's trip to Antigua in the novel tend to be sympathetic to him, the poor guy who must make the journey away from his family.
    Critics nevertheless insist that Austen's third novel is all about slavery, and they prove this by pointing out that Austen never talks about slavery in the novel. 
  • "The second major social issue that Austen makes notable by its absence from discussion is slavery."
  • "Austen "mask[s] the issue of slavery throughout the novel."
  • "Disengaging the subject of slavery from the Mansfield Park estate seems to be the implied
    critique of slavery in Austen’s Mansfield Park."
  • "Slavery plays an important, though subverted, role in the novel." 
  • "Austen's art is ironic and subtly allusive"
  • "It is significant that Austen’s only mention of the slave trade is in the form of an unanswered question."
  • "One can find topics such as histories of slavery and colonialism, both as events and structures that have contributed and continue to contribute to climate change, in the certain silences on the topics in the text or in the refusals by characters to respond to questions about slavery — for example, in Mansfield Park. Bould writes, '[C]ritics are not bathyspheric explorers plumbing textual depths. At no point do we even need to break the surface. The clamour of the unspoken is everywhere.'"
  • "We're reading the silences... we remember of course, the famous silence that everyone talks about when Fanny asks about slavery and she's met with silence.... and Austen names that silence in her books... Austen invites us to read the micro-communications..."
  • More scholarly quotes are in my article here:
     In this respect, scholars sometimes rely on the incorrect claim that Sir Thomas Bertram was silent when Fanny Price asked him about the slave trade:
  • "whatever political and colonial critique might have been implied by Fanny’s statement about Sir Thomas’s silence is subordinated to the familial drama of surrogacy and marriage and parenting... The world of the colonies is represented or subsumed by the terms of representation by the other world of the domestic."     
  •  "the text disintegrates at 'dead silence,' a phrase that ironically speaks ..."
  • “Austen deliberately invokes the dumbness of Mansfield Park concerning its own barbarity precisely because she means to rebuke it."
  • "The unanswered question is a kind of Machereyan silence which ‘uncovers what it cannot say’ (Macherey 1978: 84). Slavery may haunt the novel as a negative presence - in the title, in Fanny’s preference for Cowper’s poetry, a noted abolitionist poet, and so on - but Austen keeps it off-stage..."


Read More
0 Comments

CMP#41  Was Slavery a Taboo Topic? Part 1

4/22/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
I have thoughts. And a lot of those thoughts have to do with disagreeing with the proposition that Jane Austen’s work has secret radical messages, or that Austen was a fierce social and political critic of the times she lived in. Click here for the first in the series.

CMP#41:   Was Slavery a Taboo Subject in Austen's Time?  Part 1: Non-fiction
PictureThis publisher specialized in abolitionist material.
    In previous posts, I've briefly looked at the assertion that Austen could not speak out more explicitly about slavery in Mansfield Park (or Emma, for that matter) than she did. I've already quoted scholar George Boulokus who asserts that slavery was NOT a taboo topic in Austen's time: "In fact, there is no evidence that readers, publishers or booksellers of early nineteenth-century London either looked askance at fictional works treating these topics or worried that such topics might upset the public’s sense of propriety.” 
     In addition to works of fiction that discussed slavery, there were also many non-fiction books and pamphlets which discussed the West Indian colonies in detail. Some were abolitionist, some defended slavery, some were travel guides in which slavery was just a fact of life. In addition, there were extensive parliamentary debates and speeches.
   Anyone could read opinion pieces on all aspects: humanitarian, economic, political.
    An 1807 book titled A Permanent and Effectual Remedy for the Evils under which the British West Indies Now Labour was not about the evils of slavery, but the “evils” of the falling price of sugar and global competition, and the lack of support for the West Indies traders from the British government.  
    The Authentic History of the English West Indies (1810), described the geography and climate of the West Indies. The book included explicit accounts of the suffering of the slaves.        


Read More
1 Comment

CMP#40 In Defense of Sir Thomas

4/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Clutching My Pearls is about Jane Austen and the times she lived in.
​​ Click here for the first in the series.  
“Of all the fathers of Jane Austen’s novels, Sir Thomas is the only one
​to whom admiration is given...
                                      - Lionel Trilling

"The catastrophe of the novel depends upon our moral sympathy with Sir Thomas" 
                                                                                        -- Marvin Mudrick

CMP# 40   In Defense of Sir Thomas
PictureHarold Pinter as a guilty Sir Thomas in the 1999 movie adaptation
       Sir Thomas Bertram of Mansfield Park is almost certainly a slave owner. That being the case, it may seem not only impossible to rehabilitate his character, but indefensible to make the attempt. The question of slavery hangs over the novel, as I discussed in the previous post about symbolism.
    
   ​In Jane Austen: Writing, Society, Politics, Tom Keymer points out “Austen could perfectly well have positioned [Sir Thomas] as a self-serving anti-abolitionist, or she could have made him a reformist like the hero of Mary Brunton’s Discipline (1815)...”
​        Yes, she could have made him a villain or a reformer, but she does neither. She tells us nothing about Sir Thomas's holdings in Antigua or how he manages them. The 1999 movie adaptation portrays him as a menacing and perverted man who forced himself on captive women, but even people who like this movie understand it is not a faithful representation of the novel.
​         On the other hand, some have suggested that Sir Thomas must have sold his plantation when he went to Antigua, or that after all, the income from Antigua probably didn’t represent much of the family income compared to his local rents, and so on. Yes, perhaps he was the most benevolent slaveowner in Antigua. I won't bother attempting to speculate, because while, as we have seen, emancipation versus amelioration was discussed in Austen's time, freedom versus slavery is not contentious today. No-one today would be inclined to give Sir Thomas a patient hearing  on the matter. And in the end it is unproven and unprovable because he's a fictional character. I am not excusing the fact of Antigua.; I"m just asserting that Austen didn't tell us anything about Antigua. ​


Read More
0 Comments
<<Previous

    RSS Feed

    About the author:

    More about me here. My earlier posts (prior to June 2017) are about my time as a teacher of ESL in China,(just click on "China" in the menu below.) more recent posts focus on my writing, as well as Jane Austen and the long 18th century. Welcome!


    Categories

    All
    18th Century Novel Tropes
    Authoresses
    Book Reviews
    China
    China: Sightseeing
    Clutching My Pearls
    East & West Indies & Slavery
    Emma
    Humour
    Jane Austen
    Laowai At Large
    Mansfield Park
    Northanger Abbey
    Parody
    Persuasion
    Postmodern Pushback
    Pride Prejudice
    Religion In Austen
    Sanditon
    Sense And Sensibility
    Shelley
    Teaching

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    December 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    January 2017
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014


    RSS Feed

    © Lona Manning 2022
Proudly powered by Weebly